The native people are a delicate topic. Not only for the actual situation, this always has been delicate I think. The native people has been to consign to oblivion and discriminated for our own people. The people deny all the time our native’s blood and traditions and the government never have been responsible about the native people. The law and the legislation are not beneficial for them and for this mapuche’s people have taken extreme ways like a hunger strike, because is the only way for their rights and for their demands has been listening. The injustice over mapuche’s people and native people in general in our country it’s started since the conquest and this mentality has been the same for two hundred. Today antiterrorist law only attack the Mapuche and they only reclaim their ancestral lands and for political prisoners. Chile has created an imaginary nation when all the people want to be other person, always the government and the country wait to be as other country more development and “civilized” and they don’t want see our origins and our traditions.
I think these people represent the feeling of all the natives people of our country, because all of them stay in the same situation and the effort for give some solution for them is still invalid. The government is so slow about the law and rights of natives people. Mr. Piñera has been negligent and the people can’t wait, because they stay in an extreme situation (hunger strike) and he should be more promise with this people.
The demands of the natives people are fair, they deserve much of the country and the government has forgotten this. The antiterrorist law is unnecessary, because if the government legislates favorably, they don’t fight violently more and we can to live together and appreciating our culture.
+
The laws are horrible!!!
ResponderEliminarThe only try is protected economic and political interests. But I think that is owned up. Nothing says nothing.
The antiterrorist law don't be created because mapuches. Is one aplication of these. But yes, I think giving someone the name of "terrorist" is recognize him as an opponent and be against of he. And be against someone because is mapuche, is illogical and "sad", sociologically poor.
ResponderEliminarHi,
ResponderEliminarThe antiterrorist law have many uses, and Pinochet create it to close any possibility to claim for things that doesn't "like" to the establishment, so.. if you are a freethinker, probably you could be consider yourself like a "terrorist".
Regards